Whenever you go surfing the Internet, or just looking at the images used to advertise some skin care product services, you’d most probably see photos “before and after.”
Skin Products Reviews
Skin care product reviews also often have these images, often demonstrating drastic changes that occur after the advertised or evaluated product has been used.
In idea, these items are excellent ideas because they advertise the treatment’s beneficial impacts while also providing customers with a better, more visual look than typical review of the skin care product.
In practice, however, this concept may present a problem.
Products & Internet Technology
This is particularly true in the modern world and on the Internet, where technology can be easily used to manipulate the presentation.
For starters, these images only indicate what the situation was and what occurred after using it before the therapy for skin care.
Take note that between these two there is no fixed time interval mentioned, and most reviews of the skin care item do not really mention it either.
The reality here is that, contrary to the impression that the images might offer, it is unlikely that any kind of skin care product will generate “instant and immediate outcomes.”
The images indicate the impacts, but conveniently overlook the time interval that the medication requires to accomplish the impact shown in the image.
Expectations vs Reality
The best way to maintain one’s expectations of the consequences realistic is not to jump to conclusions about what the drug can do and when it can be done.
Another thing to maintain in mind is that images can be doctored, nowadays producing, editing, and displaying everything on a digital level.
A computer, the original picture, the right software, and a bit of know-how is all one really needs.
There are several programs out there intended to manipulate images specifically, and not all of them are costly pieces of software such as Adobe Photoshop.
Less-than-honest companies and skin care product reviews sites can readily slip into the “after” section in a physician picture, making the therapy look more efficient than it actually is.
Another strategy is to place a doctored image in the “before” section, the image being altered to look much worse than the skin’s actual condition.
This can allow it to exaggerate the drug’s beneficial impacts.
Pictures used in these advertisements or infomercials are drawn from the product’s best case situations, even if they are not doctored or manipulated.
This implies that the images may not necessarily represent the product’s average user, who may not have had outcomes as excellent as the images would lead customers to think.
Of course, showing photos of the best outcomes is natural, because otherwise it would not make marketing sense.
However, individuals tend to take these photos as typical outcome depictions,
which causes them to feel misled and disappointed when expectations are not achieved.
It should be remembered that distinct organs can respond differently to medication,
and how efficient a drug is for one individual does not always reflect how efficient it would be for another individual.
Finally, while it is a comparatively easy matter to use fake photos or different tricks to create the product more attractive,
not all skin care product reviews and dermatologists resort to this kind of “false ads.”
While it is prudent to always practice caution and not get caught in the images,
it is always possible that the images are genuine and represent what the therapy is capable of.